Download Charles Kolb - White House Daze : The Unmaking of Domestic Policy in the Bush Years PDF, MOBI, DOC
9780684863887 English 068486388X "What happened to 'We are the Change' between 1988 and 1992? The answer to that question explains why George Bush was a one-term President. The Party of new ideas had become the party of incumbency. Many Republicans now took for granted the "electoral lock," the Southern bloc, and Republican control of the executive branch. Their complacency was reinforced by the President's own high approval ratings through the first half of his term. Yet it's fair to say that for the first two years of the Bush Administration we were still spending down Ronald Reagan's inheritance. Even though the actual policies being implemented in many respects were really at odds with Reagan's core philosophy, the country had not woken up to the fact that under George Bush's stewardship federal spending (along with the deficit) was spiralling upward, taxes would start creeping up again, and regulatory policies would impose billions of dollars of new burdens on the public. This was 'change', allright, but the wrong kind of change... The cumulative effect of these deviations from Reaganism, combined with the disastrous 1990 budget deal, split the Republican national coalition and contributed to the lingering recession that began in mid-1990... Many things that Americans had long taken for granted were now changing rapidly, some in ways that would mean a stronger nation, others in ways that the public found unsettling. The country needed sound leadership that was capable of doing two essential things: explaining why the changes were happening and charting a future course to address them. What the American public got from us instead was slavish adherence to the status quo and an unwillingness or inability to explain all the major developments in a context that Americans could fathom. The country saw its sixty-eight-year-old President traveling the land expressing his own bewilderment and calling 1992 'weird, weird, man'. And 'weird' was not what people wanted or needed t, Throughout his presidency, George Bush was accused by both Republicans and Democrats of having an administration utterly without a domestic policy agenda. Kolb, who served as the Presidents Deputy Assistant for Domestic Policy, tried to push the Bush administration toward a more vigorous reform agenda. "White House Daze "is an often biting account of his efforts. What happened to We are the Change between 1988 and 1992? The answer to that question explains why George Bush was a one-term President. During Bushs term in office, the Party of new ideas had become the party of incumbency. Many Republicans now took for granted the "electoral lock," the Southern bloc, and Republican control of the executive branch. Their complacency was reinforced by the Presidents own high approval ratings through the first half of his term. Yet its fair to say that for the first two years of the Bush Administration we were still spending down Ronald Reagans inheritance. Even though the actual policies being implemented in many respects were really at odds with Reagans core philosophy, the country had not woken up to the fact that under George Bushs stewardship federal spending (along with the deficit) was spiraling upward, taxes would start creeping up again, and regulatory policies would impose billions of dollars of new burdens on the public. This was change, alright, but the wrong kind of change.
9780684863887 English 068486388X "What happened to 'We are the Change' between 1988 and 1992? The answer to that question explains why George Bush was a one-term President. The Party of new ideas had become the party of incumbency. Many Republicans now took for granted the "electoral lock," the Southern bloc, and Republican control of the executive branch. Their complacency was reinforced by the President's own high approval ratings through the first half of his term. Yet it's fair to say that for the first two years of the Bush Administration we were still spending down Ronald Reagan's inheritance. Even though the actual policies being implemented in many respects were really at odds with Reagan's core philosophy, the country had not woken up to the fact that under George Bush's stewardship federal spending (along with the deficit) was spiralling upward, taxes would start creeping up again, and regulatory policies would impose billions of dollars of new burdens on the public. This was 'change', allright, but the wrong kind of change... The cumulative effect of these deviations from Reaganism, combined with the disastrous 1990 budget deal, split the Republican national coalition and contributed to the lingering recession that began in mid-1990... Many things that Americans had long taken for granted were now changing rapidly, some in ways that would mean a stronger nation, others in ways that the public found unsettling. The country needed sound leadership that was capable of doing two essential things: explaining why the changes were happening and charting a future course to address them. What the American public got from us instead was slavish adherence to the status quo and an unwillingness or inability to explain all the major developments in a context that Americans could fathom. The country saw its sixty-eight-year-old President traveling the land expressing his own bewilderment and calling 1992 'weird, weird, man'. And 'weird' was not what people wanted or needed t, Throughout his presidency, George Bush was accused by both Republicans and Democrats of having an administration utterly without a domestic policy agenda. Kolb, who served as the Presidents Deputy Assistant for Domestic Policy, tried to push the Bush administration toward a more vigorous reform agenda. "White House Daze "is an often biting account of his efforts. What happened to We are the Change between 1988 and 1992? The answer to that question explains why George Bush was a one-term President. During Bushs term in office, the Party of new ideas had become the party of incumbency. Many Republicans now took for granted the "electoral lock," the Southern bloc, and Republican control of the executive branch. Their complacency was reinforced by the Presidents own high approval ratings through the first half of his term. Yet its fair to say that for the first two years of the Bush Administration we were still spending down Ronald Reagans inheritance. Even though the actual policies being implemented in many respects were really at odds with Reagans core philosophy, the country had not woken up to the fact that under George Bushs stewardship federal spending (along with the deficit) was spiraling upward, taxes would start creeping up again, and regulatory policies would impose billions of dollars of new burdens on the public. This was change, alright, but the wrong kind of change.